Loyalty: An Essay on the Morality of Relationships
ISBN: , SKU: , AUTHOR: Fletcher, George P., PUBLISHER: Oxford University Press, USA, At a time when age-old political structures are crumbling, civil strife abounds, ong>anong>d economic uncertainty permeates the air, ong>loyaltyong> offers us security in our relationships with associates, friends, ong>anong>d family. Yet ong>loyaltyong> is a suspect virtue. It is not impartial. It is not blind. It violates the principles of morality that have dominated Western thought for the last two hundred years. Loyalties are also thought to be irrational ong>anong>d contrary to the spirit of Capitalism. In a free market society, we are encouraged to move to the competition when we are not happy. This way of thinking has invaded our personal relationships ong>anong>d undermined our capacities for friendship ong>anong>d ong>loyaltyong> to those who do not serve our immediate interests. As George P. Fletcher writes, it is time for loyal bonds, born of history ong>anong>d experience, to prevail both over impartial morality ong>anong>d the self-interested thinking of the market trader. In this extended ong>essayong>, George P. Fletcher offers ong>anong> account of ong>loyaltyong> that illuminates its role in our relationships with family ong>anong>d friends, our ties to country, ong>anong>d the commitment of the religious to God ong>anong>d their community. Fletcher opposes the traditional view of the moral self as detached from context ong>anong>d history. He argues instead that ong>loyaltyong>, not impartial detachment, should be the central feature of our moral ong>anong>d political lives. Writing as a political "liberal," he claims that a commitment to country is necessary to improve the lot of the poor ong>anong>d disadvong>anong>taged. This commitment to country may well require greater reliong>anong>ce on patriotic rituals in education ong>anong>d a reconsideration of the Supreme Court's extending the First Amendment to protect flag burning. Given the worldwide currents of parochialism ong>anong>d political decentralization, the task for us, Fletcher argues, is to renew our commitment to a single nation united in its diversity. Bringing to bear his expertise as a law professor, Fletcher reasons that the legal systems should defer to existing relationships of ong>loyaltyong>. Familial, professional, ong>anong>d religious loyalties should be respected as relationships beyond the limits of the law. Thus surrogate mothers should not be forced to surrender ong>anong>d betray their children, spouses should not be required to testify against each other in court, parents should not be prevented from willing their property to their children, ong>anong>d the religiously committed should not be forced to act contrary to conscience. Yet the question remains: Aren't ong>loyaltyong>, ong>anong>d particularly patriotism, dong>anong>gerously one-sided? Indeed, they are, but no more thong>anong> are love ong>anong>d friendship. The challenge, Fletcher maintains, is to overcome the distorting effects of impartial morality ong>anong>d to develop a morality of ong>loyaltyong> properly suited to our emotional ong>anong>d spiritual lives. Justice has its sphere, as do loyalties. In this book, Fletcher provides the first step toward a new way of thinking that recognizes the complexity of our moral ong>anong>d political lives.